Pandemic Chronicles Stream 1
The Eye of the Storm:
Life, Death, In, Out
Pandemic Chronicles Stream 1
The Eye of the Storm:
Life, Death, In, Out
Pandemic Chronicles Stream 1
The Eye of the Storm:
Life, Death, In, Out
Pandemic Chronicles Stream 1
The Eye of the Storm:
Life, Death, In, Out

Featured Contributors to date

Ben Russell – Filmmaker, artist and curator |What Distinguishes the Past (2020, S16MM to HD video, sound, 3:54)

Ruanne Abou-Rahme & Basel Abbas – Artist duo | Title To Be Announced


Introduction

Jay Weissberg – Film critic, Variety

Take me back. Take me back. Take me back. But back where? How far back? What good is going back to the lives we led before COVID-19 if time will catch up and we go through it all over again? Don’t we instead want to leap forward, to a world made whole, even though that concept seems more impossible than going back? We use images to capture time, to stop time like a painter who captures that specific moment, perched between action and stasis. The still lifes where cornucopia brim with ripeness yet are haunted by decay: that lifelike fly is a corrupting influence, that drooping stem a sign of floral exhaustion. Cinema – film, movies, cinema, I refuse to snobbify it with a hierarchy of terminology – has been our way to hold on to time and control its progress, so how do we use it now? How do we approach whole-ness, or perhaps a more reasonable question to ask now is: can our cinephilia help salve the pain of isolation, can it comfort us when what we want most are the arms of our friends, because isn’t it the collective strength of our emotional circles that allows us to activate the ideals that art (photography, cinema, fiction, sculpture…) inspires in us?

 What films can’t do however, at least not for me, is ward off the way death closed in on us during this pandemic. Movies alter time – they may capture loved ones in moments which we’ll forever recall, imprinting the filmed moment over an actual memory not as a palimpsest but a mask. It solders time to a tangible specificity, but the awareness of what comes after is always there, just outside the frame, inhabiting the coda like the fly in the still life. The moving image is no superhero stopping the four walls of Thanatos from edging closer and closer; if we let it, cinema may even achieve the opposite. I watch a great deal of actualities, the short precursors of documentaries and newsreels that proliferated in the earliest days of the medium, and I’m always staring at the casual passersby in the streets, not just the ones gaping at the camera but the chance strollers unaware they’re being filmed, and while looking into their faces I ask myself, “what happened to you? And you?” Did that matron holding her daughter’s hand in her Sunday best live to attend the girl’s wedding? Did that five-year-old turning back, seemingly looking us in the eye, survive the trenches of the First World War fifteen years later, and if so, was he cut down by the 1918 Flu pandemic?

 When I was a child, my parents were convinced my obsession with films was a way to escape from reality, and to a certain degree throughout my entire professional life I’ve sought ways to expose the fraudulence of that diagnosis while embracing the transformative and transportive nature of the medium. Film soothes and cajoles, it rips off scabs to expose the festering mess underneath just as it puts us into a reverie of communality that makes us feel connected. During the current pandemic watching movies has become like reading poetry: we do it alone, and while we might talk afterwards on the phone or a videoconferencing platform about what we felt, in the end those images and sounds we’re experiencing sit inside us, the emotional tendrils they generate unable to connect and flourish with others due to the viral vacuum. 

And yet they continue to link us, fusing thoughts together, concretizing our hopes while shoring up our flagging spirits. In Équipée, Victor Segalen asked, “is the Imagination weakened or reinforced when it comes face to face with the Real?” Reinforced, yes, reinforced. Because the liminal space between Imagination and Reality is where cinema thrives, where the inexpressible takes shape. Its physical manifestation is that darkened room where an audience sits enthralled, bathed in the flattering glow of the screen where attention is fixed whilst an invisible spirit weaves together our unconscious and strengthens the bond we’ve developed with the moving image and each other. While the industry wrings their hands expressing fear that the post-pandemic world will have gotten used to watching movies alone, I reject that scenario. I’m no optimist, but we are a society hungry for that which connects us, and the experience of separation has made us famished.

 

Stream 1 – The Eye of the Storm: Life, Death, In, Out

Provocation

The Coronavirus pandemic has paralyzed the world, erupting into our lives and bringing us face to face with issues of life, death and survival. It has also laid bare the deep structural inequalities that exist across the globe and the wealth and power divide that underpins them. As questions of resources come into sharp focus – from front-line healthcare workers and people concerned for their livelihoods, to marginalised and excluded communities from north to south – and as life and death urgency takes centre stage, how might one respond to these extremes? How can we meditate on the condition of being human? On the radical upheaval of life as we know it? And given the global dimension of this crisis, how can we reflect on varied states of being in or out? Artists, filmmakers, writers and curators respond in a series of micro shorts and written texts.

Watch Now


Featuring a soundtrack melted out of a Cyndi Lauper CD, here is an(other) attempt to find a way through the everywhere fog of 2020. Filmed between 2019's Carpathian Mountains, Vilnius punk clubs and Belarusian Independence Day celebrations. This is an overgrown path, a ghost-poem, a companion piece to Jonathan Schwartz's FOR THEM ENDING (2006) – and a memorial for Jonathan, completed two years after his death.


 

Coming Soon



 

Jay Weissberg

New York-born Jay Weissberg lives in Rome and has been a film critic there for Variety since 2003, travelling to film festivals throughout Europe, the MENA region, and Latin America. His work on contemporary cinema has appeared in international publications including Sight & Sound and The London Review of Books, and he’s contributed essays in numerous festival and retrospective catalogues, with a particular focus on Arab and Romanian film. He was appointed director of the Giornate del Cinema Muto/Pordenone Silent Film Festival in 2015 and has written widely about silent film, curating programs including “The Effects of War” and, for this year’s online-only festival, “The Urge to Travel.” As co-curator of the Ottoman Film Project he and his colleagues are identifying, cataloging and screening films shot in the Ottoman Empire, and he delivered the Distinguished Lecture for the Berj H. Haidostian Annual Lecture Series at the University of Michigan, entitled, “Views of the Ottoman Empire: Discovering the Visual Record in Motion.” A frequent participant of festival juries, he often takes part in panel discussions on the current state of cinema and film criticism, has been a guest of the Harvard Film Archives/Gulbenkian Foundation’s Cinema Dialogues, and acted as mentor in international programs for young film critics. His discussion on Romanian cinema appears as an extra on Criterion’s Bluray/DVD release of Cristian Mungiu’s 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days. His blog “The Silent Cat” delves into forgotten stories of the silent film era.

(Photo Credit: Giulio C. Ladini)

 

Ben Russell

"Ben Russell—filmmaker, artist, curator—challenges conventions of documentary representation from within to produce intense, hypnotic, and, at times, hallucinating experiences. His curatorial work follows his filmmaking, which unfolds between experimental cinema and a form of speculative ethnography; he calls it 'psychedelic ethnography.'

Watching a film by Russell means going on a nonnarrative, ritualized journey, one that short-circuits the visceral subjective charge of psychedelia with ethnographic protocols of visualization and objectification. The particular power of his filmic work lies in underscoring the affinities and differences to be found between these two different states. An experience that he forges, on the one hand, through examining the cinematic apparatus itself and its potential for immersion and mimetic identification, and, on the other, by the very subjects and subject matter of his films, which often traverse the liminal and engage in altered states of consciousness and in secular practices of ritual and trance. 'Transformative experiences,' Russell says, 'go hand in hand with critical awareness of cinematic devices and their historically coded limitations.'

About Ben Russell’s What Distinguishes the Past

"The increase of disorder or entropy is what distinguishes the past from the future, giving a direction to time." – Stephen Hawkings

Featuring a soundtrack melted out of a Cyndi Lauper CD, here is an(other) attempt to find a way through the everywhere fog of 2020. Filmed between 2019's Carpathian Mountains, Vilnius punk clubs and Belarusian Independence Day celebrations. This is an overgrown path, a ghost-poem, a companion piece to Jonathan Schwartz's FOR THEM ENDING (2006) – and a memorial for Jonathan, completed two years after his death.

Ruanne Abou-Rahme
& Basel Abbas

Basel Abbas and Ruanne Abou-Rahme work together across a range of sound, image, text, installation and performance practices. Their practice is engaged in the intersections between performativity, political imaginaries, the body and virtuality. Across their works they probe a contemporary landscape marked by seemingly perpetual crisis and an endless ‘present’, one that is shaped by a politics of desire and disaster. They have been developing a body of work that questions this suspension of the present and searches for ways in which an altogether different imaginary and language can emerge that is not bound within colonial/capitalist narrative and discourse. In their projects, they find themselves excavating, activating and inventing incidental narratives, figures, gestures and sites as material for re-imagining the possibilities of the present. Often reflecting on ideas of non-linearity in the form of returns, amnesia and deja vu, and in the process unfolding the slippages between actuality and projection (fiction, myth, wish), what is and what could be. Largely their approach has been one of sampling materials both existing and self-authored in the form of sound, image, text, objects and recasting them into altogether new ‘scripts’. The result is a practice that investigates the political, visceral, material possibilities of sound, image, text and site, taking on the form of multi-media installations and live sound/image performances.